Mistral Nemo vs Mistral Small 3.2: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.2
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0600
Output$0.1800
Cached Input$0.0300
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
66.7% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
77.8% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Mistral Small 3.2
+0 tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
Mistral Small 3.2
$0.2400
$0.0600/1M input + $0.1800/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 75.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Mistral Small 3.2?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs Mistral Small 3.2?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Mistral Small 3.2 has 131.1K tokens. Mistral Nemo supports a larger context window of 131.1K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.