Mistral Nemo vs Command R: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Cohere
Command R
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1500
Output$0.6000
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output4.1K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
86.7% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
93.3% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Mistral Nemo
+3.1K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
Command R
$0.7500
$0.1500/1M input + $0.6000/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 92.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Command R?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs Command R?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Command R has 128K tokens. Mistral Nemo supports a larger context window of 131.1K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.