Command A+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Cohere
Command A+
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$1.50
Cached Input$0.1500
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Command A+
80.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Command A+
80.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.5
+0 tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Command A+
$1.80
$0.3000/1M input + $1.50/1M output
Mistral Medium 3.5
$9.00
$1.50/1M input + $7.50/1M output
Command A+ is 80.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Command A+ or Mistral Medium 3.5?
For input tokens, Command A+ is cheaper at $0.3000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Command A+ is cheaper at $1.50 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Command A+ vs Mistral Medium 3.5?
Command A+ has a context window of 256K tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.5 has 256K tokens. Command A+ supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.