Command R vs Mistral Medium 3.1: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Cohere
Command R
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1500
Output$0.6000
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output4.1K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.4000
Output$2.00
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Command R
62.5% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Command R
70.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.1
+3.1K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Command R
$0.7500
$0.1500/1M input + $0.6000/1M output
Mistral Medium 3.1
$2.40
$0.4000/1M input + $2.00/1M output
Command R is 68.8% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Command R or Mistral Medium 3.1?
For input tokens, Command R is cheaper at $0.1500 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Command R is cheaper at $0.6000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Command R vs Mistral Medium 3.1?
Command R has a context window of 128K tokens, while Mistral Medium 3.1 has 131.1K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 supports a larger context window of 131.1K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.