Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Command A: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.4000
Output$2.00
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Cohere
Command A
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$2.50
Output$10.00
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Medium 3.1
84.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Medium 3.1
80.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Command A
+124.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1
$2.40
$0.4000/1M input + $2.00/1M output
Command A
$12.50
$2.50/1M input + $10.00/1M output
Mistral Medium 3.1 is 80.8% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Command A?
For input tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.4000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $2.00 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Command A?
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Command A has 256K tokens. Command A supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.