Mistral Nemo vs Grok Code Fast: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
xAI
Grok Code Fast
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.2000
Output$1.50
Cached Input$0.0200
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
90.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
97.3% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Grok Code Fast
+124.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
Grok Code Fast
$1.70
$0.2000/1M input + $1.50/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 96.5% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Grok Code Fast?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs Grok Code Fast?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Grok Code Fast has 256K tokens. Grok Code Fast supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.