Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.6 Terra: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
OpenAI
GPT-5.6 Terra
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$2.00
Output$12.00
Cached Input$0.2000
Batch Input$1.00
Batch Output$6.00
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
99.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
99.7% cheaper
Larger Context Window
GPT-5.6 Terra
+868.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
GPT-5.6 Terra
$14.00
$2.00/1M input + $12.00/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 99.6% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or GPT-5.6 Terra?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.6 Terra?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while GPT-5.6 Terra has 1M tokens. GPT-5.6 Terra supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.