Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
OpenAI
GPT-5.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$5.00
Output$30.00
Cached Input$0.5000
Batch Input$2.50
Batch Output$15.00
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext + image + audio
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
99.6% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
99.9% cheaper
Larger Context Window
GPT-5.5
+868.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
GPT-5.5
$35.00
$5.00/1M input + $30.00/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 99.8% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or GPT-5.5?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.5?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while GPT-5.5 has 1M tokens. GPT-5.5 supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.