Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.1: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
OpenAI
GPT-5.1
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$1.25
Output$10.00
Cached Input$0.1250
Context & Output
Context Window400K tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
98.4% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
99.6% cheaper
Larger Context Window
GPT-5.1
+268.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
GPT-5.1
$11.25
$1.25/1M input + $10.00/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 99.5% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or GPT-5.1?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs GPT-5.1?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while GPT-5.1 has 400K tokens. GPT-5.1 supports a larger context window of 400K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.