GPT-4.1 nano vs Claude Opus 4.6: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 nano
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1000
Output$0.4000
Cached Input$0.0250
Batch Input$0.0500
Batch Output$0.2000
Context & Output
Context Window1.0M tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$5.00
Output$25.00
Cached Input$0.5000
Batch Input$2.50
Batch Output$12.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
GPT-4.1 nano
98.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
GPT-4.1 nano
98.4% cheaper
Larger Context Window
GPT-4.1 nano
+847.6K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
GPT-4.1 nano
$0.5000
$0.1000/1M input + $0.4000/1M output
Claude Opus 4.6
$30.00
$5.00/1M input + $25.00/1M output
GPT-4.1 nano is 98.3% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GPT-4.1 nano or Claude Opus 4.6?
For input tokens, GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.1000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, GPT-4.1 nano is cheaper at $0.4000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of GPT-4.1 nano vs Claude Opus 4.6?
GPT-4.1 nano has a context window of 1.0M tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 has 200K tokens. GPT-4.1 nano supports a larger context window of 1.0M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
How do GPT-4.1 nano and Claude Opus 4.6 compare for batch processing?
Both models support batch processing with discounted rates. GPT-4.1 nano offers a better batch rate at $0.0500 per 1M input tokens. Batch processing is ideal for non-time-sensitive workloads where you can wait for processing.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.