DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3.2
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.2800
Output$0.4200
Cached Input$0.0280
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$2.50
Cached Input$0.0300
Batch Input$0.1500
Batch Output$1.25
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output65.5K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext + image + audio
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
DeepSeek V3.2
6.7% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
DeepSeek V3.2
83.2% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Gemini 2.5 Flash
+872K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
$0.7000
$0.2800/1M input + $0.4200/1M output
Gemini 2.5 Flash
$2.80
$0.3000/1M input + $2.50/1M output
DeepSeek V3.2 is 75.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Gemini 2.5 Flash?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper at $0.2800 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper at $0.4200 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of DeepSeek V3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash?
DeepSeek V3.2 has a context window of 128K tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash has 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.