Mistral Small 3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite: Pricing Comparison

Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.

Mistral

Mistral Small 3.2

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$0.0600
Output$0.1800
Cached Input$0.0300

Context & Output

Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens

Capabilities

Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes

Google

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

Pricing (per 1M tokens)

Input$0.1000
Output$0.4000
Cached Input$0.0100
Batch Input$0.0500
Batch Output$0.2000

Context & Output

Context Window1M tokens
Max Output65.5K tokens

Capabilities

Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image + audio
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes

Quick Verdict

Cheaper Input Price

Mistral Small 3.2

40.0% cheaper

Cheaper Output Price

Mistral Small 3.2

55.0% cheaper

Larger Context Window

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

+868.9K tokens

Cost Comparison

Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens

Mistral Small 3.2

$0.2400

$0.0600/1M input + $0.1800/1M output

Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite

$0.5000

$0.1000/1M input + $0.4000/1M output

Mistral Small 3.2 is 52.0% cheaper for this workload.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?
For input tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0600 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.1800 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Small 3.2 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite?
Mistral Small 3.2 has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite has 1M tokens. Gemini 2.5 Flash Lite supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.

Need more tools?

Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.