Mistral Nemo vs DeepSeek Flash (V4.1): Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
DeepSeek
DeepSeek Flash (V4.1)
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$1.20
Cached Input$0.006000
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output384K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
93.3% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
96.7% cheaper
Larger Context Window
DeepSeek Flash (V4.1)
+868.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
DeepSeek Flash (V4.1)
$1.50
$0.3000/1M input + $1.20/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 96.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or DeepSeek Flash (V4.1)?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs DeepSeek Flash (V4.1)?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while DeepSeek Flash (V4.1) has 1M tokens. DeepSeek Flash (V4.1) supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.