Command R vs DeepSeek V3.2: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Cohere
Command R
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1500
Output$0.6000
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output4.1K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3.2
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.2800
Output$0.4200
Cached Input$0.0280
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Command R
46.4% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
DeepSeek V3.2
30.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
DeepSeek V3.2
+0 tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Command R
$0.7500
$0.1500/1M input + $0.6000/1M output
DeepSeek V3.2
$0.7000
$0.2800/1M input + $0.4200/1M output
DeepSeek V3.2 is 6.7% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Command R or DeepSeek V3.2?
For input tokens, Command R is cheaper at $0.1500 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper at $0.4200 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Command R vs DeepSeek V3.2?
Command R has a context window of 128K tokens, while DeepSeek V3.2 has 128K tokens. Command R supports a larger context window of 128K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.