Llama 4 Scout vs Codestral: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0800
Output$0.3000
Context & Output
Context Window327.7K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Mistral
Codestral
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$0.9000
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Llama 4 Scout
73.3% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Llama 4 Scout
66.7% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Llama 4 Scout
+71.7K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Llama 4 Scout
$0.3800
$0.0800/1M input + $0.3000/1M output
Codestral
$1.20
$0.3000/1M input + $0.9000/1M output
Llama 4 Scout is 68.3% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Llama 4 Scout or Codestral?
For input tokens, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.0800 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Llama 4 Scout is cheaper at $0.3000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Llama 4 Scout vs Codestral?
Llama 4 Scout has a context window of 327.7K tokens, while Codestral has 256K tokens. Llama 4 Scout supports a larger context window of 327.7K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.