Command R vs Codestral: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Cohere
Command R
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1500
Output$0.6000
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output4.1K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Mistral
Codestral
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$0.9000
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Command R
50.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Command R
33.3% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Codestral
+128K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Command R
$0.7500
$0.1500/1M input + $0.6000/1M output
Codestral
$1.20
$0.3000/1M input + $0.9000/1M output
Command R is 37.5% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Command R or Codestral?
For input tokens, Command R is cheaper at $0.1500 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Command R is cheaper at $0.6000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Command R vs Codestral?
Command R has a context window of 128K tokens, while Codestral has 256K tokens. Codestral supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.