Codestral vs Command A: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Codestral
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$0.9000
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Cohere
Command A
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$2.50
Output$10.00
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Codestral
88.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Codestral
91.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Command A
+0 tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Codestral
$1.20
$0.3000/1M input + $0.9000/1M output
Command A
$12.50
$2.50/1M input + $10.00/1M output
Codestral is 90.4% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Codestral or Command A?
For input tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.3000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.9000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Codestral vs Command A?
Codestral has a context window of 256K tokens, while Command A has 256K tokens. Codestral supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.