Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$1.50
Output$7.50
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$3.00
Output$15.00
Cached Input$0.3000
Batch Input$1.50
Batch Output$7.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output64K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Medium 3.5
50.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Medium 3.5
50.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.5
+56K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.5
$9.00
$1.50/1M input + $7.50/1M output
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$18.00
$3.00/1M input + $15.00/1M output
Mistral Medium 3.5 is 50.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.5 or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
For input tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $1.50 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper at $7.50 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Claude Sonnet 4.6?
Mistral Medium 3.5 has a context window of 256K tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 200K tokens. Mistral Medium 3.5 supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.