DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1400
Output$0.2800
Cached Input$0.0280
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output384K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$3.00
Output$15.00
Cached Input$0.3000
Batch Input$1.50
Batch Output$7.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output64K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
DeepSeek V4 Flash
95.3% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
DeepSeek V4 Flash
98.1% cheaper
Larger Context Window
DeepSeek V4 Flash
+800K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.4200
$0.1400/1M input + $0.2800/1M output
Claude Sonnet 4.6
$18.00
$3.00/1M input + $15.00/1M output
DeepSeek V4 Flash is 97.7% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Claude Sonnet 4.6?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.1400 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.2800 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Sonnet 4.6?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has a context window of 1M tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 200K tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.