DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V3.2
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.2800
Output$0.4200
Cached Input$0.0280
Context & Output
Context Window128K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$3.00
Output$15.00
Cached Input$0.3000
Batch Input$1.50
Batch Output$7.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output64K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
DeepSeek V3.2
90.7% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
DeepSeek V3.2
97.2% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Claude Sonnet 4.5
+72K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
DeepSeek V3.2
$0.7000
$0.2800/1M input + $0.4200/1M output
Claude Sonnet 4.5
$18.00
$3.00/1M input + $15.00/1M output
DeepSeek V3.2 is 96.1% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V3.2 or Claude Sonnet 4.5?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper at $0.2800 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V3.2 is cheaper at $0.4200 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of DeepSeek V3.2 vs Claude Sonnet 4.5?
DeepSeek V3.2 has a context window of 128K tokens, while Claude Sonnet 4.5 has 200K tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports a larger context window of 200K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.