Mistral Small 3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.7: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Small 3.2
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0750
Output$0.2000
Cached Input$0.0100
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.7
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$5.00
Output$25.00
Cached Input$0.5000
Batch Input$2.50
Batch Output$12.50
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Small 3.2
98.5% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Small 3.2
99.2% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Claude Opus 4.7
+868.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Small 3.2
$0.2750
$0.0750/1M input + $0.2000/1M output
Claude Opus 4.7
$30.00
$5.00/1M input + $25.00/1M output
Mistral Small 3.2 is 99.1% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Claude Opus 4.7?
For input tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0750 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.2000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Small 3.2 vs Claude Opus 4.7?
Mistral Small 3.2 has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Claude Opus 4.7 has 1M tokens. Claude Opus 4.7 supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.