Codestral vs Claude Opus 4.6: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Codestral
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$0.9000
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.6
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$5.00
Output$25.00
Cached Input$0.5000
Batch Input$2.50
Batch Output$12.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output128K tokens
Capabilities
Categoryflagship
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Codestral
94.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Codestral
96.4% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Codestral
+56K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Codestral
$1.20
$0.3000/1M input + $0.9000/1M output
Claude Opus 4.6
$30.00
$5.00/1M input + $25.00/1M output
Codestral is 96.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Codestral or Claude Opus 4.6?
For input tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.3000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.9000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Codestral vs Claude Opus 4.6?
Codestral has a context window of 256K tokens, while Claude Opus 4.6 has 200K tokens. Codestral supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.