Mistral Nemo vs Claude Haiku 4.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Nemo
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.0200
Output$0.0400
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$1.00
Output$5.00
Cached Input$0.1000
Batch Input$0.5000
Batch Output$2.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output64K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Nemo
98.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Nemo
99.2% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Claude Haiku 4.5
+68.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Nemo
$0.0600
$0.0200/1M input + $0.0400/1M output
Claude Haiku 4.5
$6.00
$1.00/1M input + $5.00/1M output
Mistral Nemo is 99.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Nemo or Claude Haiku 4.5?
For input tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0200 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Nemo is cheaper at $0.0400 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Nemo vs Claude Haiku 4.5?
Mistral Nemo has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 has 200K tokens. Claude Haiku 4.5 supports a larger context window of 200K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.