DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.1400
Output$0.2800
Cached Input$0.0280
Context & Output
Context Window1M tokens
Max Output384K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 4.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$1.00
Output$5.00
Cached Input$0.1000
Batch Input$0.5000
Batch Output$2.50
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output64K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
DeepSeek V4 Flash
86.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
DeepSeek V4 Flash
94.4% cheaper
Larger Context Window
DeepSeek V4 Flash
+800K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash
$0.4200
$0.1400/1M input + $0.2800/1M output
Claude Haiku 4.5
$6.00
$1.00/1M input + $5.00/1M output
DeepSeek V4 Flash is 93.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DeepSeek V4 Flash or Claude Haiku 4.5?
For input tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.1400 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, DeepSeek V4 Flash is cheaper at $0.2800 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of DeepSeek V4 Flash vs Claude Haiku 4.5?
DeepSeek V4 Flash has a context window of 1M tokens, while Claude Haiku 4.5 has 200K tokens. DeepSeek V4 Flash supports a larger context window of 1M tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.