Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Claude Haiku 3.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Mistral Medium 3.1
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.4000
Output$2.00
Context & Output
Context Window131.1K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 3.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.8000
Output$4.00
Cached Input$0.0800
Batch Input$0.4000
Batch Output$2.00
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Mistral Medium 3.1
50.0% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Mistral Medium 3.1
50.0% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Claude Haiku 3.5
+68.9K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Mistral Medium 3.1
$2.40
$0.4000/1M input + $2.00/1M output
Claude Haiku 3.5
$4.80
$0.8000/1M input + $4.00/1M output
Mistral Medium 3.1 is 50.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Mistral Medium 3.1 or Claude Haiku 3.5?
For input tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $0.4000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Mistral Medium 3.1 is cheaper at $2.00 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Claude Haiku 3.5?
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a context window of 131.1K tokens, while Claude Haiku 3.5 has 200K tokens. Claude Haiku 3.5 supports a larger context window of 200K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.