Codestral vs Claude Haiku 3.5: Pricing Comparison
Compare pricing, capabilities, and costs for your LLM workloads.
Mistral
Codestral
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.3000
Output$0.9000
Context & Output
Context Window256K tokens
Max Output32.8K tokens
Capabilities
Categorymid
Multimodaltext
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Anthropic
Claude Haiku 3.5
Pricing (per 1M tokens)
Input$0.8000
Output$4.00
Cached Input$0.0800
Batch Input$0.4000
Batch Output$2.00
Context & Output
Context Window200K tokens
Max Output8.2K tokens
Capabilities
Categorybudget
Multimodaltext + image
Fine-tuningNo
StreamingYes
Quick Verdict
Cheaper Input Price
Codestral
62.5% cheaper
Cheaper Output Price
Codestral
77.5% cheaper
Larger Context Window
Codestral
+56K tokens
Cost Comparison
Sample workload: 1,000,000 input tokens + 1,000,000 output tokens
Codestral
$1.20
$0.3000/1M input + $0.9000/1M output
Claude Haiku 3.5
$4.80
$0.8000/1M input + $4.00/1M output
Codestral is 75.0% cheaper for this workload.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, Codestral or Claude Haiku 3.5?
For input tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.3000 per 1M tokens. For output tokens, Codestral is cheaper at $0.9000 per 1M tokens. The overall cost depends on your workload's input/output ratio.
What is the context window size of Codestral vs Claude Haiku 3.5?
Codestral has a context window of 256K tokens, while Claude Haiku 3.5 has 200K tokens. Codestral supports a larger context window of 256K tokens, which is beneficial for processing longer documents.
Need more tools?
Explore our complete suite of LLM calculators and comparison tools.